AHIT ONCOURSE LEARNING LICENSE

If Bone had no vote, then the Board vote actually was a tie – and the motion to revoke failed.Ĭount on that rearing its ugly head in the inevitable appeal. The statute says a member “shall not serve on the board for more than six (6) consecutive years,” a time limit Bone passed last summer. That narrowly split vote came with one more fly in the ointment. Here, again, is a case where spelling out the Board’s reasons would be much more shrewd, and useful, than ducking behind “miscellaneous” reasons - particularly when dropping a severe penalty like revocation on anyone. None of the “nay” votes gave an explanation for opposing revocation. 9(1)(L).) The only thing other schools can be sure about it that “other duties” does not mean any of the other 11 specific causes for revocation in the rule – like fraud, deceit, or false statements falsifying records, or such. (The Board motion said it was revoking under “922 KAR6:040 sec 9 1(l).” They meant 815 KAR6:040 Sec. The single-vote majority voting for revocation claimed AHIT deserved revocation, rather than any lesser penalty, and the graduates who were waiting for licenses had to keep waiting.ĪHIT”s violation was “failing to comply with any other duty improved on providers in this administrative regulation” – whatever that means. The vote to revoke was 4-3, the first closely split vote on the Board in half a decade. Still, though Paepcke owned up to the problem, and offered practically any remedy short of sacrificing the first born on an alter, she was not well prepared for this board and seemed short on legal advice. Some students had received refunds apparently. She said AHIT “would be willing to pay for it” with other providers, to be sure they delivered field training that met the KBHI rules. “I made the mistake they could do their field training on their own,” she told the Board. Paepcke took responsibility for the problem and offered to doing anything they could to fix it. Revocation was handed down despite the best efforts of Katie Paepcke, the AHIT/OnCourse Learning Compliance and CE Manager, at the meeting.

AHIT ONCOURSE LEARNING LICENSE

The KBHI also resisted online license renewals during the meeting, though online renewals are being installed for practically all Kentucky licensing boards and commissions now.

Draft regulations doing just that also were reviewed at the same KBHI meeting Tuesday, though they are months away from taking effect, if they ever do. Like this….Ī major KBHI policy change now in the works would eliminate online training for prelicensing, and strictly limit online CE. It is one of the least expensive prelicense courses, at about $695 (though later it often turns out there’s more). Stuck AHIT graduates at the meeting all did their prelicense training with AHIT online. Revoking AHIT approval also is the first skirmish in what may become a running Board battle against online education.

However, an AHIT representative told the Board there were about 11 pending or coming license applications from AHIT programs. It is not clear if the Board action calls into question other home inspector licenses previously issued to AHIT graduates. It was the first time the KBHI revoked an educational provider’s approval. AHIT, the American Home Inspectors Training Institute, took a hit from the Kentucky Board of Home Inspectors (“KBHI”) at its November meeting Tuesday.

Ahit oncourse learning